Recently, the late artist Chen's oil painting involved in buying and selling, because the parties to the nanhui court and to lift the storm. August 12,, xinmin nets reporters from nanhui district court that court to the parties demand the return of 14 painting or compensation of $1.95 million oil painting the claims not to support.
Chen was painting business dispute smooth
Xinmin nets from nanhui district court to understand, Mr. Wu said the parties, on August 5, 2004 with the late artist Chen signed agreement: by Mr. Wu to provide Russian oil painting and picture Chen, Street view oil painting of RMB 1.95 million yuan. After the event, Mr. Wu according to Chen's instructions have, this batch of oil painting to send to the Shanghai just Thai culture Co., LTD. Mr. Zhou place. Mr. Wu to court says, Chen died in 2005 before the complete payment of the painting not money, so demand the return of the paintings.
April 23, 2007, Mr. Wu to Shanghai first intermediate people's court, the heir to the requirements and the rest of the oil painting Chen pay. First think, Mr. Wu failed to prove the agreement expressly agreed upon delivery mode existing, also failed to proof of delivery by Chen's instructions, so the ruling on Mr. Wu filing did not support. After Mr. Wu appeal, the higher people's court rejected the Shanghai its appeal.
The court was again rejected betray a person to appeal
The trial court in nanhui district that, Mr. Wu's delivery to just 14 oil paintings, is affected by Chen or Chen arts company's instructions, Mr. Wu to dispute the ownership of the Forest oil painting in delivery and shift, so Mr. Wu requirements and Mr. Zhou's just return the original object's petition, in not law-based, did not support. As for just peaceful company and Chen or Chen arts company to dispute between oil painting what kind of legal relationships, and Mr. Wu and the buying and selling of the relationship between Chen is another layer of legal relationship. Accordingly, the court shall make the decision.
没有评论:
发表评论